Oakland Spent $74 Million Settling 417 Police Brutality Lawsuits

An Occupy Oakland protester is arrested in the early morning hours of Thurs, November 3, 2011 in Frank Ogawa Plaza. Lawsuits alleging excessive force by OPD officers during the demonstrations have cost the city more than $6 million in settlements. Photo by Elijah Nouvelage.

A Catholic priest who said an officer put him in a chokehold and slammed his head into a glass door. A woman who said she shouldn’t have been handcuffed when officers arrested her.

A father who claimed officers beat him in the hallway outside of his child’s hospital room until his head was bloody. A bank robber who was shot by officers after a high-speed chase. A man whose head was slammed into something so hard that the bones in his face broke.

In each situation the Oakland Police Department was sued. And in each one, the City of Oakland chose to settle out of court rather than take the case to trial.

A review of Oakland City Attorney lawsuit data and hundreds of federal and state court cases has found that since 1990, Oakland and private insurance carriers have spent $74 million dollars to settle at least 417 lawsuits accusing its police officers of brutality, misconduct and other civil rights violations.

Oakland spends more on civil-rights police lawsuits than nearly any other California law enforcement agency, with multimillion-dollar settlements coming directly out of funds that could go to libraries, police and fire services or road repair.

Supporters of the Oakland Police Department say that high number is a reflection of the city’s willingness to settle at any cost. But Oakland Police Beat’s analysis found that the City of Oakland has successfully defended itself against many lawsuits it considers to be unfounded.

Our investigation found that more than 500 officers were named in those lawsuits. At least 72 of those officers were named in three or more of the suits. Settlement amounts per lawsuits range from $100 to the nearly $11 million paid out following the so-called Riders scandal, where more than 100 plaintiffs accused officers of beating, kidnapping and planting evidence on suspects.

Historically, the number of OPD-related lawsuits filed against the city varies from year to year. But over the last three years the number of cases settled dropped, leaving some — like Oakland civil rights attorney Jim Chanin — cautiously hopeful that long-sought-after reforms are beginning to impact the Oakland Police Department.

The Oakland Police Department was given advance opportunity to preview our findings and respond. It has not done so. This story will be updated if that occurs.

Why Oakland Settles Instead of Fights

Civil rights cases most often involve allegations that an officer or officers used excessive force. Cases also include allegations of discrimination, false arrest, illegally obtained search warrants, wrongful death and other types of misconduct.

In settling the cases the city does not admit to wrongdoing. It pays the plaintiff a mutually agreed upon amount of money; in return the plaintiff drops the litigation.

As with any kind of civil litigation, not all lawsuits filed against the Oakland Police Department are found to be factually accurate. Since 1990, Oakland has succeeded in having more than 100 OPD use of force-related lawsuits dismissed.

The cases that Oakland settles have gone through an exhaustive series of steps by the City Attorney’s office before a final decision is made by the Oakland City Council, which is responsible for approving all settlements over $5,000.

Jayne Williams, Oakland’s City Attorney from 1987 to 2000, said that the city first investigates the facts of each case to determine if the city is in fact liable. Alex Katz, the current City Attorney’s chief of staff, declined to comment on other details about the process, citing the need to keep the city’s legal strategy private.

However, court records show the back-and-forth legal wrangling the city goes through — usually over several years — in an effort to get a case thrown out. It can be an expensive process. Because the City Attorney’s office has a small staff, it sometimes brings in outside council to assist with cases. That’s happened with 61 OPD use of force-related lawsuits since 2000. Those extra lawyers have cost the city nearly $40 million.

According to Katz, the City Council’s final decision is often based not on the facts of the case, but on how much money the city would spend taking the case to trial — and how much it would lose if a jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Williams described the final steps in determining whether the city should settle as a cost-benefit analysis.

After publication Katz clarified: “Every decision on settlements is based on the facts and evidence of the case. You are correct that factors can include a cost benefit analysis. For example, if a case will cost $100,000 to take to trial, or if there’s a significant risk of a much higher judgment against the city, then it may be in the city’s interests to settle for $5,000. Of course, you can’t do that analysis without considering the facts of each case.”

Private insurance carriers often cover part of the cost of a settlement. The total that Oakland is responsible for comes out of the city’s general fund. Oakland’s general fund is typically used to run the city. It finances the city’s departments, its debts, its staff, as well as programs and services like parks and recreation and economic development.

Except in a case where a judge awards punitive damages, California law exempts officers from having to pay for all or part of a settlement. According to Williams and Katz, since 1990 no Oakland Police Department officer has covered the cost of a settlement in a civil rights-related case.

Oakland vs. California and the Nation

Oakland’s high settlement total for civil rights-related cases is unique in California — and likely the nation — for cities and police departments of a similar size.

Data for comparison is difficult to obtain. California cities were either unresponsive to our requests for police lawsuit information, or only had information from a small time span. Or, as in the case of San Jose, has no way of differentiating between civil rights and non-civil rights cases in its records. Bakersfield redacted the public records they sent us so heavily that they provided little useful information.

OPD Sergeant Steven Nowak has been named in nine civil rights-related lawsuits that were settled by the city -- the second highest number of any officer on the force in the last 20 years. The lawsuits were settled for a combined total of $6.9 million. Photo: Eric K Arnold.

OPD sergeants Steven Nowak (pictured) and Bernard Ortiz and officer Jude Siapno have each been named in nine civil rights-related lawsuits that were settled by the city — the highest individual total for any officer on the force in the last 20 years. Nowak’s lawsuits were settled for a combined total of $6.9 million. Photo: Eric K Arnold.

Researchers who’ve tried to analyze lawsuits filed against police have run into the same issues we did. In one study of 699 municipal police departments, only 30% would provide researchers with sufficient data. A study published last year that included 74 law enforcement agencies around the country — ranging from 36,000 sworn officers to a single officer — found that many of them simply do not keep records of lawsuits.

That’s perhaps unsurprising. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 61% of state police, local police, and sheriff’s departments polled in a national survey do not have any kind of computerized monitoring or assessment system that could be used to track lawsuits filed against the department or individual officers. (The OPD was not in that group.)

When compared to the 74 agencies in the study published last year (which was conducted by Joanna Schwartz, Assistant Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law), between 2006 and 2010 the only agencies that paid more in civil rights-related settlements than Oakland are some of the largest in the country. New York City, with 36,000 officers, spent $350 million on 6,113 cases; the sheriff’s department for Cook County, Illinois, where Chicago is located, has 5,655 officers and spent $76 million on 507 cases. Oakland, with only 766 officers, spent $22 million on 55 cases.

Oakland was ranked similarly in California during that same time period:

  • Los Angeles County Sheriff (9,461 officers): $54 million on 248 cases
  • Los Angeles Police Department (9,727 officers): $48 million on 155 cases
  • Oakland Police Department (766 officers): $22 million on 55 cases
  • California Highway Patrol (7,202 officers): $19 million on 68 cases
  • Santa Anna Police Department (365 officers): $2.8 million on 21 cases
  • San Diego Police Department (1,951 officers): $374,000 $374,000 on five cases [See clarification notes]

The number of lawsuits the city settles varies widely from year to year. But in two of the last three years the number has dropped to one of the lowest points since 1990. Oakland settled seven lawsuits filed in 2010 and three from 2012, down from 22 in 2005. The all-time high was 40 in 2001.

There are at least five civil rights-related OPD cases that are still open in federal court, including two related to the OPD’s use of force during the Occupy Oakland demonstrations. (Occupy lawsuits have cost the city more than $6 million in settlements so far.) It will take several years to determine if the downward trend represents a decrease in civil rights lawsuits filed against the OPD or a shift in the city’s settlement strategy.

But attorney James Chanin, who’s been working on police brutality cases in Oakland since the late 1970s, thinks there’s a possibility that what’s happened in the last few years is in fact something significant. If this shift does reflect meaningful change, it touches on more than just how the Oakland Police Department deals with civil rights lawsuits after they’ve been filed.

“We have more co-operation from the [police] union than we’ve ever had. I think we have a good chief. I think the political apparatus is coming around a little bit,” he said.

“It’s just been so many years that it was mediocre or worse [that I’m] loath to make sweeping predictions about progress. But I am cautiously optimistic.”

John Russo, City Attorney from Sept. 2000 to June 2011 could not be reach for comment for this story.

Laura McCamy contributed reporting to this story.

The Oakland Police Beat Officer Database was researched and compiled by Abraham Hyatt, Rin Kelly and Laura McCamy.

Editor’s note in response to Oakland City Attorney Chief of Staff Alex Katz: Oakland Police Beat had extensive communication with the City Attorney’s Office before we launched the site. Between March 1, 2013 and April 1, 2014, approximately 50 emails were exchanged between the Police Beat team and the City Attorney’s staff, the majority of which were between Editor Abraham Hyatt and Arlette Flores, Open Government Coordinator for Oakland City Attorney’s Office; Katz was included on many of them. Those emails also include Oakland Police Beat’s requests that the City Attorney’s office correct errors we found in the data it provided.
During that time period Katz and Hyatt spoke twice on the phone about the data, during which Hyatt explained the scope and nature of Oakland Police Beat. Hyatt and Publisher Susan Mernit also met with members of the City Administrator’s Office to discuss the project.
We respect the city’s desire to differentiate between what it pays in a settlement and what its insurance companies pay. However, the total settlement is what the city is responsible for, regardless of how the payments are costed out. We have clarified the story to reflect that distinction, but the total settlement amounts that we have reported on were provided by the City Attorney’s office and are factually correct. Oakland Police Beat stands by its stories and its data.


  1. Abraham,

    Very interesting story, however, I have to point out a couple of problems.

    One, you misrepresented my comments in this sentence: “According to Katz, the City Council’s final decision is often based not on the facts of the case…”

    Every decision on settlements is based on the facts and evidence of the case. You are correct that factors can include a cost benefit analysis. For example, if a case will cost $100,000 to take to trial, or if there’s a significant risk of a much higher judgment against the city, then it may be in the city’s interests to settle for $5,000. Of course, you can’t do that analysis without considering the facts of each case.

    My other concern is this. You guys did a tremendous amount of research (and I want to point out that my office spent a huge amount of time providing this data to you). But I think the story is missing some important information. For example, what is the number of civil rights/misconduct cases filed against each city? Is Oakland sued at a higher rate than the other 73 cities in the study? And what is the nature of the lawsuits? If Santa Ana only had a couple of civil rights cases during the period in question, then of course their total settlements will be far lower.

    Without any indication of the number and nature of the lawsuits filed against each city, there is no context for the total settlement amounts.

    • Hi Alex – Thanks for the response. I added the first part of the comment to the story so that the quote is clarified and added the number of civil rights cases to the list of cities.

  2. So…what happens to these psychotic thugs who repeatedly burden the taxpayers with the responsibility for their criminal sadism?

    • they’re celebrated and given paid vacations

  3. To the Editor:

    After reviewing your data, I have to inform you that the numbers reported in this story and the headline are in error.

    A review of the same data the City provided to Mr. Hyatt in response to his public records requests shows that the City of Oakland paid approximately $43 million to settle police conduct lawsuits (use of force, civil rights, wrongful death, etc.) between 1990 and the story’s publication date.

    It appears that some basic misunderstandings of the data resulted in your reporters overinflating the actual amount by more than $30 million.

    Here are the problems:

    First, the story counts settlements paid by private insurance companies as money “spent” by the City. In the last 24 years, about $19.6 million of settlement costs for police conduct cases were paid by third party, private insurance companies, not by the City of Oakland. Settlements paid by insurance carriers do not come out of the City’s budget. This $19.6 million is not public money, so it’s not “coming directly out of funds that could go to libraries, police and fire services or road repair.”

    For example, your database includes the $4.5 million settlement of the Olsen case. Before you published this story, our Office sent a press release to your reporters stating that a private insurance carrier paid $2.7 million of the $4.5 million settlement amount. However, you included the total $4.5 million in your database of money spent by the City.

    In the “Riders” case, it was widely reported that about $8.6 million of the total $10.9 million settlement was paid by insurance company defendants, not by the City. However, you counted the full $10.9 million in your total for money spent by the city.

    You also counted the $1.5 million settlement of the Hornung wrongful termination case, although that settlement was agreed to and paid entirely by Kemper Insurance Companies, a private entity. The City had no part in it. Also, this is a wrongful termination case filed by a former police officer, so it’s not clear why you included it in a database of alleged police “brutality” cases.

    Second, your total for settlements includes jury verdicts and other judgments, which obviously are not settlements. From our review of the data, it appears that your total includes more than $8 million in judgments for cases the City did not settle, but took to trial. For example, the $4.45 million jury verdict in the Torry Smith case is counted in your total for settlements.

    Third, your total includes payments of claims. Claims are not lawsuits. Claims are often paid in order to avoid expensive litigation, and in fact on average less than 3% of claims against the City evolve into lawsuits. It looks like you only have about 11 claims in your database, mostly filed by suspects who said they were falsely arrested. These cases don’t represent a huge amount of money. But they certainly are not “police brutality lawsuits.”

    Fourth, some of the cases you count as “brutality” cases belong in a different category. The Hornung case, again, is a wrongful termination case. In the Chan case, which settled for $1.5 million, plaintiffs alleged that a mistake by a police dispatcher led to two deaths. This is tragic, but it’s disingenuous to call it a “brutality” or “misconduct” case.

    To be clear, the raw data provided by the City included all payments in police conduct cases, i.e., litigation settlements, judgments and payments of claims. We thought it was clear that the data included all payments, but we did not confirm that the reporters shared that understanding.

    However, although Mr. Hyatt worked on this story for more than a year, he did not share his conclusions with us or with the Police Department until the day before publication. He never asked us to fact check or to help analyze the data, and we were not able to see the database until the story was published. If you had provided us that opportunity, we could have pointed out these problems in advance.

    Because the amount of money the City spends on police conduct cases is an important issue, we request that you correct the record by publishing accurate numbers and correcting/clarifying as necessary the database posted on your website.

    Here are the most accurate numbers based on our review of City records for the past 24 years:

    Total settlement amount for cases involving police conduct, use of force, wrongful death, etc. (January 1, 1990 – April 9, 2014): $62,953,388

    Total paid by insurance companies: $19,605,284

    Total paid by City of Oakland: $43,348,104

    Alex Katz

    Oakland City Attorney’s Office

    • maybe you should include the rising cost of insurance, since this many claims paid out most certainly raises the cost of insuring ourselves, as a city, against these losses

      meanwhile, why does the city pay out lawsuits for illegal actions committed by city employees? why are those employees not charged with the criminal actions which result in these ‘settlements’ ? and why are they not fired? why don’t the costs come out of the police budget, or police union? it’s ridiculous that we all bear the costs of police thuggery



  1. Oakland Police Misconduct Settlements, Visualized | Oaktown Data - […] Recommended Reading: Oakland Spent $74 Million Settling 417 Police Brutality Lawsuits […]
  2. Oakland Police Officer Named In Most Lawsuits Is Out at OPD - Oakland Police Beat - […] Based on an investigation by Oakland Police Beat, Ortiz, as well as Sgt. Steven Nowak and officer Jude Siapno, …
  3. Oakland Spent $74 Million Settling 417 Police Brutality Lawsuits - Liberty Crier - […] Oakland Spent $74 Million Settling 417 Police Brutality Lawsuits [continued] […]
  4. BreakThru Radio - […] in Independent Media:"Oakland Spent $74 Million Settling 417 Police Brutality Lawsuits" (Apr 9, Oakland Police Beat)"Air monitoring in fracking …
  5. Newsworthy 04-18-2014 | Opine Time - […] Oakland Spent $74 Million Settling 417 Police Brutality Lawsuits Excerpt: A Catholic priest who said an officer put him …

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>